apple-touch-icon gmail Facebook: David B. Rivkin, Jr. David Rivkin on Flickr David Rivkin: Google+ David Rivkin: LinkedIn tumblr Twitter: @DavidRivkin WordPress: Just Our Freedom YouTube: JustOurFreedom Wikipedia: David Rivkin Zimbio: David Rivkin

Loading...
Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Share to Linkedin 

News

President’s “Recess” Appointments unconstitutional, David Rivkin testifies

(WASHINGTON)— The Committee on Oversight and Government Reform  chaired by Darrell Issa (R-CA) is set to begin a hearing on the morning of February 1 on President Obama's recess appointments to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). During the hearing, titled "Uncharted Territory: What are the Consequences of President Obama's Unprecedented 'Recess' Appointments?", constitutional attorney David Rivkin will assert that the appointments are unconstitutional.

On January 4, 2012, President Obama made  the following "recess" appointments: Richard Cordray as Director of the CFPB and Richard Griffin, Jr., Sharon Block, and Terence F. Flynn as members of the NLRB.  At the time of the appointments, the Senate was holding a series of "pro forma" sessions.  While the U.S. Department of Justice claims that the President has the authority to make these appointments, in essence, to decide for himself when Congress is in session, David Rivkin and other constitutional law experts disagree.

“The Constitution allows the President to make recess appointments only when the Senate is in recess; it does not guarantee him the right to make one or more of such appointments,” says Rivkin in his written testimony.

According to RIvkin, the Office of Legal Counsel  “takes what was meant and written as a gap-filler or safety valve – what to do when the Senate is out-of-town and unable to confirm a nominee to a vital position –  and converts it into an affirmative grant of power that guarantees the President the right to make some number of appointments without the Senate’s approval.”  This will weaken Congress’ power.

The hearing is being held in Rayburn House Office Building room 2154 at 9:30 a.m. February 1.  Additional witnesses include Senator Mike Lee (R-UT), former White House advisor C. Boyden Gray, and Michael Gerhardt, Professor in Constitutional Law, University of North Carolina.

   

Can Obama’s imperial power grabs be stopped? Rivkin tells Lou Dobbs

Constitutional Attorney David Rivkin to debunk the president’s latest controversial move on immigration on Fox Business Network

Published on 9 January 2012

by Brent Baldwin

(OfficialWire)

WASHINGTON, D.C. (USA)
OfficialWire PR News Bureau

David Rivkin, the lawyer who designed and argued the successful multi-state challenge to ObamaCare, is turning his guns on the latest and possibly the most egregious unconstitutional power grab by the Obama administration. Watch Rivkin in action on Lou Dobbs.

David Rivkin will be interviewed on Lou Dobbs Tonight on the Fox Business Network Thursday, January 12 (7 to 8 p.m. EST) regarding a recent article he co-authored for The Washington Post about President Barack Obama’s claims that he can preempt state law whenever immigration policy “might irritate a foreign government.”

The case stems from the Arizona immigration policy of penalizing illegal immigrants, and, according to Rivkin, it boils down to an unprecedented expansion of presidential power, among others.

“This is a stunning and audacious power grab, far more expansive than the legal theories that prompted critics of President George W. Bush to argue that he established an ‘imperial presidency.’ It simply cannot be that, despite all the Constitution’s limitations on federal power and executive action, the president’s powers become absolute whenever another nation complains.”

The Supreme Court has granted swift review of this issue, and Rivkin will explain on tonight’s show what he believes about the repudiation of Obama’s latest power grab will be quickly forthcoming.

Source: http://www.officialwire.com/main.php?action=posted_news&rid=311146

   

Are Bush and Obama war criminals?

David Rivkin joins all-star panel at Ralph Nader's debate

Published on 10 November 2011

by Colin Fuess

(OfficialWire)

WASHINGTON, D.C. (USA)
OfficialWire PR News Bureau

Ralph Nader and the Center for Study of Responsive Law’s “Debating Taboos” series continues Friday, November 18 with “Bush/Obama: War Crimes or Lawful Wars?”

The debate format consists of two moderators and four debaters.  Arguing against the proposition that Bush and Obama engaged in war crimes are attorneys David Rivkin and Lee Casey.  Rivkin served in the Department of Justice under Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush, and is renowned for articulate commentary on the U.S. Constitution and presidential war powers.  Casey, Rivkin’s frequent collaborator, also served in the DOJ under Reagan and H.W. Bush, and currently specializes in compliance issues under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), U.S. trade sanctions regimes, and federal ethics requirements.  He has also served on the United Nations Subcommission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights.

Arguing for the proposition that Bush and Obama engaged in war crimes are attorney and constitutional scholar Bruce Fein and retired Lt. Colonel Tony Shaffer.

Ralph Nader, who founded the Center for Study of Responsive Law in 1968, has gone on record that Bush and Obama are war criminals for their actions in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The debate will be held Friday, November 18 at the Carnegie Institution building at 1530 P Street in Washington, D.C., at 12:30 p.m.  The event is free and open to the public, and a complimentary light lunch will follow the debate.

For further information, contact Katherine Raymond at 202-387-8030 or at  This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

About The Center for Study of Responsive Law:

The Center for Study of Responsive Law is a nonprofit Ralph Nader organization that supports and conducts a wide variety of research and educational projects to encourage the political, economic and social institutions of this country to be more aware of the needs of the citizen-consumer. The Center publishes a variety of reports on a number of public interest issues.


Source: http://www.officialwire.com/main.php?action=posted_news&rid=305952

   

Richmond’s Fourth Circuit is stage for next “lawfare” battle against military and national security officials

David Rivkin to present oral arguments for Donald Rumsfeld, Robert Gates, other Secretaries of Defense

Published on 25 October 2011

by Staff

(OfficialWire)

RICHMOND, VIRGINIA (USA)
OfficialWire PR News Bureau

Jose Padilla, a U.S. citizen, former gang member, and designated enemy combatant who was sentenced to 17 years in prison, is mounting an aggressive appeal. The oral arguments on October 26 in Richmond’s Fourth Circuit will strike at the heart of the Constitution.

Padilla brought a lawsuit against former Secretary of State Donald Rumsfeld and other high-ranking officials, alleging he was illegally detained and tortured in the military brig after his 2002 arrest. That suit, which has been described as “lawfare” or exacting personal and financial “flesh” from an opponent, was dismissed last February by a federal judge in Charleston, South Carolina, who ruled Padilla had no right to sue for constitutional violations.

Now Padilla’s appeal, Estela Lebron, for herself and as Mother and Next Friend of Jose Padilla vs. Donald Rumsfeld et al, will be heard in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Richmond, Virginia. In addition to the issue of “lawfare,” this appeal will seek to decide several questions related to legal rights of “enemy combatants”:

  • Whether U.S. officials are entitled to “qualified immunity” against claims that they unconstitutionally and unlawfully seized, detained, abused, and tortured a U.S. citizen on U.S. soil.
  • Whether “special factors” preclude a Bivens remedy (a Bivens claim involves whether an individual alleging a Fourth Amendment violation, such as unreasonable search and seizure, can sue the offenders under the Constitution) for the unconstitutional seizure, detention, abuse, and torture of a U.S. citizen on U.S. soil.
  • Whether the district court erred in holding that Plaintiffs lack standing to contest Jose Padilla’s ongoing designation as an “enemy combatant.”

The case is scheduled for the morning of Wednesday, Oct. 26 in the Red Room (Room 412) of the Lewis F. Powell, Jr. United States Courthouse in Richmond, beginning at 9:30 a.m. and the media is invited to attend.

Former White House lawyer, David B. Rivkin, Jr., the attorney famous for crafting the successful constitutional challenge to ObamaCare, as well as other attorneys from the law firm Baker Hostetler, will be in Richmond representing Mr. Rumsfeld and is available after the hearing for interviews.

Contact
The Hardwicke Group

Jason Yu 
Tel: 8883647771 
WebsiteTwitter
MEDIA CONTACT

Source: http://www.officialwire.com/main.php?action=posted_news&rid=304009

   

Page 3 of 20

Sign up

Like what you see? Want to receive David Rivkin's latest articles without searching? Sign up for David's email newsletter.

Twitter Feed

By A Web Design

© Copyright 2012 David Rivkin